Kubernetes Pods
are mortal. They are born and when they die, they
are not resurrected. ReplicaSets
in
particular create and destroy Pods
dynamically (e.g. when scaling up or down). While each Pod
gets its own IP address, even
those IP addresses cannot be relied upon to be stable over time. This leads to
a problem: if some set of Pods
(let’s call them backends) provides
functionality to other Pods
(let’s call them frontends) inside the Kubernetes
cluster, how do those frontends find out and keep track of which backends are
in that set?
Enter Services
.
A Kubernetes Service
is an abstraction which defines a logical set of Pods
and a policy by which to access them - sometimes called a micro-service. The
set of Pods
targeted by a Service
is (usually) determined by a Label
Selector
(see below for why you might want a
Service
without a selector).
As an example, consider an image-processing backend which is running with 3
replicas. Those replicas are fungible - frontends do not care which backend
they use. While the actual Pods
that compose the backend set may change, the
frontend clients should not need to be aware of that or keep track of the list
of backends themselves. The Service
abstraction enables this decoupling.
For Kubernetes-native applications, Kubernetes offers a simple Endpoints
API
that is updated whenever the set of Pods
in a Service
changes. For
non-native applications, Kubernetes offers a virtual-IP-based bridge to Services
which redirects to the backend Pods
.
A Service
in Kubernetes is a REST object, similar to a Pod
. Like all of the
REST objects, a Service
definition can be POSTed to the apiserver to create a
new instance. For example, suppose you have a set of Pods
that each expose
port 9376 and carry a label "app=MyApp"
.
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-service
spec:
selector:
app: MyApp
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 9376
This specification will create a new Service
object named “my-service” which
targets TCP port 9376 on any Pod
with the "app=MyApp"
label. This Service
will also be assigned an IP address (sometimes called the “cluster IP”), which
is used by the service proxies (see below). The Service
’s selector will be
evaluated continuously and the results will be POSTed to an Endpoints
object
also named “my-service”.
Note that a Service
can map an incoming port to any targetPort
. By default
the targetPort
will be set to the same value as the port
field. Perhaps
more interesting is that targetPort
can be a string, referring to the name of
a port in the backend Pods
. The actual port number assigned to that name can
be different in each backend Pod
. This offers a lot of flexibility for
deploying and evolving your Services
. For example, you can change the port
number that pods expose in the next version of your backend software, without
breaking clients.
Kubernetes Services
support TCP
and UDP
for protocols. The default
is TCP
.
Services generally abstract access to Kubernetes Pods
, but they can also
abstract other kinds of backends. For example:
Namespace
or on another cluster.In any of these scenarios you can define a service without a selector:
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-service
spec:
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 9376
Because this service has no selector, the corresponding Endpoints
object will not be
created. You can manually map the service to your own specific endpoints:
kind: Endpoints
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-service
subsets:
- addresses:
- ip: 1.2.3.4
ports:
- port: 9376
NOTE The endpoint IPs may not be loopback (127.0.0.0/8), link-local (169.254.0.0/16), or link-local multicast (224.0.0.0/24). They cannot be the cluster IPs of other Kubernetes services either because thekube-proxy
component doesn’t support virtual IPs as destination yet.
Accessing a Service
without a selector works the same as if it had a selector.
The traffic will be routed to endpoints defined by the user (1.2.3.4:9376
in
this example).
An ExternalName service is a special case of service that does not have selectors. It does not define any ports or Endpoints. Rather, it serves as a way to return an alias to an external service residing outside the cluster.
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-service
namespace: prod
spec:
type: ExternalName
externalName: my.database.example.com
When looking up the host my-service.prod.svc.CLUSTER
, the cluster DNS service
will return a CNAME
record with the value my.database.example.com
. Accessing
such a service works in the same way as others, with the only difference that
the redirection happens at the DNS level and no proxying or forwarding occurs.
Should you later decide to move your database into your cluster, you can start
its pods, add appropriate selectors or endpoints and change the service type
.
Every node in a Kubernetes cluster runs a kube-proxy
. kube-proxy
is
responsible for implementing a form of virtual IP for Services
of type other
than ExternalName
.
In Kubernetes v1.0, Services
are a “layer 4” (TCP/UDP over IP) construct, the
proxy was purely in userspace. In Kubernetes v1.1, the Ingress
API was added
(beta) to represent “layer 7”(HTTP) services, iptables proxy was added too,
and become the default operating mode since Kubernetes v1.2. In Kubernetes v1.8.0-beta.0,
ipvs proxy was added.
In this mode, kube-proxy watches the Kubernetes master for the addition and
removal of Service
and Endpoints
objects. For each Service
it opens a
port (randomly chosen) on the local node. Any connections to this “proxy port”
will be proxied to one of the Service
’s backend Pods
(as reported in
Endpoints
). Which backend Pod
to use is decided based on the
SessionAffinity
of the Service
. Lastly, it installs iptables rules which
capture traffic to the Service
’s clusterIP
(which is virtual) and Port
and redirects that traffic to the proxy port which proxies the backend Pod
.
By default, the choice of backend is round robin.
Note that in the above diagram, clusterIP
is shown as ServiceIP
.
In this mode, kube-proxy watches the Kubernetes master for the addition and
removal of Service
and Endpoints
objects. For each Service
, it installs
iptables rules which capture traffic to the Service
’s clusterIP
(which is
virtual) and Port
and redirects that traffic to one of the Service
’s
backend sets. For each Endpoints
object, it installs iptables rules which
select a backend Pod
. By default, the choice of backend is random.
Obviously, iptables need not switch back between userspace and kernelspace, it should be
faster and more reliable than the userspace proxy. However, unlike the
userspace proxier, the iptables proxier cannot automatically retry another
Pod
if the one it initially selects does not respond, so it depends on
having working readiness probes.
Note that in the above diagram, clusterIP
is shown as ServiceIP
.
Kubernetes v1.9
beta
In this mode, kube-proxy watches Kubernetes Services and Endpoints,
calls netlink
interface to create ipvs rules accordingly and syncs ipvs rules with Kubernetes
Services and Endpoints periodically, to make sure ipvs status is
consistent with the expectation. When Service is accessed, traffic will
be redirected to one of the backend Pods.
Similar to iptables, Ipvs is based on netfilter hook function, but uses hash table as the underlying data structure and works in the kernel space. That means ipvs redirects traffic much faster, and has much better performance when syncing proxy rules. Furthermore, ipvs provides more options for load balancing algorithm, such as:
rr
: round-robinlc
: least connectiondh
: destination hashingsh
: source hashingsed
: shortest expected delaynq
: never queueNote: ipvs mode assumes IPVS kernel modules are installed on the node before running kube-proxy. When kube-proxy starts with ipvs proxy mode, kube-proxy would validate if IPVS modules are installed on the node, if it’s not installed kube-proxy will fall back to iptables proxy mode.
In any of these proxy model, any traffic bound for the Service’s IP:Port is
proxied to an appropriate backend without the clients knowing anything
about Kubernetes or Services or Pods. Client-IP based session affinity
can be selected by setting service.spec.sessionAffinity
to “ClientIP”
(the default is “None”), and you can set the max session sticky time by
setting the field service.spec.sessionAffinityConfig.clientIP.timeoutSeconds
if you have already set service.spec.sessionAffinity
to “ClientIP”
(the default is “10800”).
Many Services
need to expose more than one port. For this case, Kubernetes
supports multiple port definitions on a Service
object. When using multiple
ports you must give all of your ports names, so that endpoints can be
disambiguated. For example:
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-service
spec:
selector:
app: MyApp
ports:
- name: http
protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 9376
- name: https
protocol: TCP
port: 443
targetPort: 9377
You can specify your own cluster IP address as part of a Service
creation
request. To do this, set the .spec.clusterIP
field. For example, if you
already have an existing DNS entry that you wish to replace, or legacy systems
that are configured for a specific IP address and difficult to re-configure.
The IP address that a user chooses must be a valid IP address and within the
service-cluster-ip-range
CIDR range that is specified by flag to the API
server. If the IP address value is invalid, the apiserver returns a 422 HTTP
status code to indicate that the value is invalid.
A question that pops up every now and then is why we do all this stuff with virtual IPs rather than just use standard round-robin DNS. There are a few reasons:
We try to discourage users from doing things that hurt themselves. That said, if enough people ask for this, we may implement it as an alternative.
Kubernetes supports 2 primary modes of finding a Service
- environment
variables and DNS.
When a Pod
is run on a Node
, the kubelet adds a set of environment variables
for each active Service
. It supports both Docker links
compatible variables (see
makeLinkVariables)
and simpler {SVCNAME}_SERVICE_HOST
and {SVCNAME}_SERVICE_PORT
variables,
where the Service name is upper-cased and dashes are converted to underscores.
For example, the Service "redis-master"
which exposes TCP port 6379 and has been
allocated cluster IP address 10.0.0.11 produces the following environment
variables:
REDIS_MASTER_SERVICE_HOST=10.0.0.11
REDIS_MASTER_SERVICE_PORT=6379
REDIS_MASTER_PORT=tcp://10.0.0.11:6379
REDIS_MASTER_PORT_6379_TCP=tcp://10.0.0.11:6379
REDIS_MASTER_PORT_6379_TCP_PROTO=tcp
REDIS_MASTER_PORT_6379_TCP_PORT=6379
REDIS_MASTER_PORT_6379_TCP_ADDR=10.0.0.11
This does imply an ordering requirement - any Service
that a Pod
wants to
access must be created before the Pod
itself, or else the environment
variables will not be populated. DNS does not have this restriction.
An optional (though strongly recommended) cluster
add-on is a DNS server. The
DNS server watches the Kubernetes API for new Services
and creates a set of
DNS records for each. If DNS has been enabled throughout the cluster then all
Pods
should be able to do name resolution of Services
automatically.
For example, if you have a Service
called "my-service"
in Kubernetes
Namespace
"my-ns"
a DNS record for "my-service.my-ns"
is created. Pods
which exist in the "my-ns"
Namespace
should be able to find it by simply doing
a name lookup for "my-service"
. Pods
which exist in other Namespaces
must
qualify the name as "my-service.my-ns"
. The result of these name lookups is the
cluster IP.
Kubernetes also supports DNS SRV (service) records for named ports. If the
"my-service.my-ns"
Service
has a port named "http"
with protocol TCP
, you
can do a DNS SRV query for "_http._tcp.my-service.my-ns"
to discover the port
number for "http"
.
The Kubernetes DNS server is the only way to access services of type
ExternalName
. More information is available in the DNS Pods and Services.
Sometimes you don’t need or want load-balancing and a single service IP. In
this case, you can create “headless” services by specifying "None"
for the
cluster IP (.spec.clusterIP
).
This option allows developers to reduce coupling to the Kubernetes system by allowing them freedom to do discovery their own way. Applications can still use a self-registration pattern and adapters for other discovery systems could easily be built upon this API.
For such Services
, a cluster IP is not allocated, kube-proxy does not handle
these services, and there is no load balancing or proxying done by the platform
for them. How DNS is automatically configured depends on whether the service has
selectors defined.
For headless services that define selectors, the endpoints controller creates
Endpoints
records in the API, and modifies the DNS configuration to return A
records (addresses) that point directly to the Pods
backing the Service
.
For headless services that do not define selectors, the endpoints controller does
not create Endpoints
records. However, the DNS system looks for and configures
either:
ExternalName
-type services.Endpoints
that share a name with the service, for all
other types.For some parts of your application (e.g. frontends) you may want to expose a Service onto an external (outside of your cluster) IP address.
Kubernetes ServiceTypes
allow you to specify what kind of service you want.
The default is ClusterIP
.
Type
values and their behaviors are:
ClusterIP
: Exposes the service on a cluster-internal IP. Choosing this value
makes the service only reachable from within the cluster. This is the
default ServiceType
.NodePort
: Exposes the service on each Node’s IP at a static port (the NodePort
).
A ClusterIP
service, to which the NodePort
service will route, is automatically
created. You’ll be able to contact the NodePort
service, from outside the cluster,
by requesting <NodeIP>:<NodePort>
.LoadBalancer
: Exposes the service externally using a cloud provider’s load balancer.
NodePort
and ClusterIP
services, to which the external load balancer will route,
are automatically created.ExternalName
: Maps the service to the contents of the externalName
field
(e.g. foo.bar.example.com
), by returning a CNAME
record with its value.
No proxying of any kind is set up. This requires version 1.7 or higher of
kube-dns
.If you set the type
field to NodePort
, the Kubernetes master will
allocate a port from a range specified by --service-node-port-range
flag (default: 30000-32767), and each
Node will proxy that port (the same port number on every Node) into your Service
.
That port will be reported in your Service
’s .spec.ports[*].nodePort
field.
If you want to specify particular IP(s) to proxy the port, you can set the --nodeport-addresses
flag in kube-proxy to particular IP block(s) (which is supported since Kubernetes v1.10). A comma-delimited list of IP blocks (e.g. 10.0.0.0/8, 1.2.3.4/32) is used to filter addresses local to this node. For example, if you start kube-proxy with flag --nodeport-addresses=127.0.0.0/8
, kube-proxy will select only the loopback interface for NodePort Services. The --nodeport-addresses
is defaulted to empty ([]
), which means select all available interfaces and is in compliance with current NodePort behaviors.
If you want a specific port number, you can specify a value in the nodePort
field, and the system will allocate you that port or else the API transaction
will fail (i.e. you need to take care about possible port collisions yourself).
The value you specify must be in the configured range for node ports.
This gives developers the freedom to set up their own load balancers, to configure environments that are not fully supported by Kubernetes, or even to just expose one or more nodes’ IPs directly.
Note that this Service will be visible as both <NodeIP>:spec.ports[*].nodePort
and .spec.clusterIP:spec.ports[*].port
. (If the --nodeport-addresses
flag in kube-proxy is set,
On cloud providers which support external load balancers, setting the type
field to LoadBalancer
will provision a load balancer for your Service
.
The actual creation of the load balancer happens asynchronously, and
information about the provisioned balancer will be published in the Service
’s
.status.loadBalancer
field. For example:
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-service
spec:
selector:
app: MyApp
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 9376
clusterIP: 10.0.171.239
loadBalancerIP: 78.11.24.19
type: LoadBalancer
status:
loadBalancer:
ingress:
- ip: 146.148.47.155
Traffic from the external load balancer will be directed at the backend Pods
,
though exactly how that works depends on the cloud provider. Some cloud providers allow
the loadBalancerIP
to be specified. In those cases, the load-balancer will be created
with the user-specified loadBalancerIP
. If the loadBalancerIP
field is not specified,
an ephemeral IP will be assigned to the loadBalancer. If the loadBalancerIP
is specified, but the
cloud provider does not support the feature, the field will be ignored.
Special notes for Azure: To use user-specified public type loadBalancerIP
, a static type
public IP address resource needs to be created first, and it should be in the same resource
group of the cluster. Specify the assigned IP address as loadBalancerIP. Verify you have
securityGroupName in the cloud provider configuration file.
In a mixed environment it is sometimes necessary to route traffic from services inside the same VPC.
In a split-horizon DNS environment you would need two services to be able to route both external and internal traffic to your endpoints.
This can be achieved by adding the following annotations to the service based on cloud provider.
Select one of the tabs.
[...]
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
cloud.google.com/load-balancer-type: "Internal"
[...]
Use cloud.google.com/load-balancer-type: "internal"
for masters with version 1.7.0 to 1.7.3.
For more information, see the docs.
[...]
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-internal: 0.0.0.0/0
[...]
[...]
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/azure-load-balancer-internal: "true"
[...]
[...]
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/openstack-internal-load-balancer: "true"
[...]
For partial SSL support on clusters running on AWS, starting with 1.3 three
annotations can be added to a LoadBalancer
service:
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-ssl-cert: arn:aws:acm:us-east-1:123456789012:certificate/12345678-1234-1234-1234-123456789012
The first specifies the ARN of the certificate to use. It can be either a certificate from a third party issuer that was uploaded to IAM or one created within AWS Certificate Manager.
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-backend-protocol: (https|http|ssl|tcp)
The second annotation specifies which protocol a pod speaks. For HTTPS and SSL, the ELB will expect the pod to authenticate itself over the encrypted connection.
HTTP and HTTPS will select layer 7 proxying: the ELB will terminate
the connection with the user, parse headers and inject the X-Forwarded-For
header with the user’s IP address (pods will only see the IP address of the
ELB at the other end of its connection) when forwarding requests.
TCP and SSL will select layer 4 proxying: the ELB will forward traffic without modifying the headers.
In a mixed-use environment where some ports are secured and others are left unencrypted, the following annotations may be used:
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-backend-protocol: http
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-ssl-ports: "443,8443"
In the above example, if the service contained three ports, 80
, 443
, and
8443
, then 443
and 8443
would use the SSL certificate, but 80
would just
be proxied HTTP.
Beginning in 1.9, services can use predefined AWS SSL policies for any HTTPS or SSL listeners. To see which policies are available for use, run the awscli command:
aws elb describe-load-balancer-policies --query 'PolicyDescriptions[].PolicyName'
Any one of those policies can then be specified using the
“service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-ssl-negotiation-policy
“
annotation, for example:
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-ssl-negotiation-policy: "ELBSecurityPolicy-TLS-1-2-2017-01"
To enable PROXY protocol support for clusters running on AWS, you can use the following service annotation:
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-proxy-protocol: "*"
Since version 1.3.0 the use of this annotation applies to all ports proxied by the ELB and cannot be configured otherwise.
There are several annotations to manage access logs for ELB services on AWS.
The annotation service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-access-log-enabled
controls whether access logs are enabled.
The annotation service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-access-log-emit-interval
controls the interval in minutes for publishing the access logs. You can specify
an interval of either 5 or 60.
The annotation service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-access-log-s3-bucket-name
controls the name of the Amazon S3 bucket where load balancer access logs are
stored.
The annotation service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-access-log-s3-bucket-prefix
specifies the logical hierarchy you created for your Amazon S3 bucket.
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-access-log-enabled: "true"
# Specifies whether access logs are enabled for the load balancer
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-access-log-emit-interval: "60"
# The interval for publishing the access logs. You can specify an interval of either 5 or 60 (minutes).
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-access-log-s3-bucket-name: "my-bucket"
# The name of the Amazon S3 bucket where the access logs are stored
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-access-log-s3-bucket-prefix: "my-bucket-prefix/prod"
# The logical hierarchy you created for your Amazon S3 bucket, for example `my-bucket-prefix/prod`
Connection draining for Classic ELBs can be managed with the annotation
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-draining-enabled
set
to the value of "true"
. The annotation
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-draining-timeout
can
also be used to set maximum time, in seconds, to keep the existing connections open before deregistering the instances.
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-draining-enabled: "true"
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-draining-timeout: "60"
There are other annotations to manage Classic Elastic Load Balancers that are described below.
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-connection-idle-timeout: "60"
# The time, in seconds, that the connection is allowed to be idle (no data has been sent over the connection) before it is closed by the load balancer
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-cross-zone-load-balancing-enabled: "true"
# Specifies whether cross-zone load balancing is enabled for the load balancer
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-additional-resource-tags: "environment=prod,owner=devops"
# A comma-separated list of key-value pairs which will be recorded as
# additional tags in the ELB.
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-healthcheck-healthy-threshold: ""
# The number of successive successful health checks required for a backend to
# be considered healthy for traffic. Defaults to 2, must be between 2 and 10
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-healthcheck-unhealthy-threshold: "3"
# The number of unsuccessful health checks required for a backend to be
# considered unhealthy for traffic. Defaults to 6, must be between 2 and 10
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-healthcheck-interval: "20"
# The approximate interval, in seconds, between health checks of an
# individual instance. Defaults to 10, must be between 5 and 300
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-healthcheck-timeout: "5"
# The amount of time, in seconds, during which no response means a failed
# health check. This value must be less than the service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-healthcheck-interval
# value. Defaults to 5, must be between 2 and 60
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-extra-security-groups: "sg-53fae93f,sg-42efd82e"
# A list of additional security groups to be added to ELB
Warning: This is an alpha feature and not recommended for production clusters yet.
Starting in version 1.9.0, Kubernetes supports Network Load Balancer (NLB). To
use a Network Load Balancer on AWS, use the annotation service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-type
with the value set to nlb
.
metadata:
name: my-service
annotations:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-type: "nlb"
Unlike Classic Elastic Load Balancers, Network Load Balancers (NLBs) forward the
client’s IP through to the node. If a service’s .spec.externalTrafficPolicy
is
set to Cluster
, the client’s IP address will not be propagated to the end
pods.
By setting .spec.externalTrafficPolicy
to Local
, client IP addresses will be
propagated to the end pods, but this could result in uneven distribution of
traffic. Nodes without any pods for a particular LoadBalancer service will fail
the NLB Target Group’s health check on the auto-assigned
.spec.healthCheckNodePort
and not receive any traffic.
In order to achieve even traffic, either use a DaemonSet, or specify a pod anti-affinity to not locate pods on the same node.
NLB can also be used with the internal load balancer annotation.
In order for client traffic to reach instances behind an NLB, the Node security groups are modified with the following IP rules:
Rule | Protocol | Port(s) | IpRange(s) | IpRange Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Health Check | TCP | NodePort(s) (.spec.healthCheckNodePort for .spec.externalTrafficPolicy = Local ) |
VPC CIDR | kubernetes.io/rule/nlb/health=<loadBalancerName> |
Client Traffic | TCP | NodePort(s) | .spec.loadBalancerSourceRanges (defaults to 0.0.0.0/0 ) |
kubernetes.io/rule/nlb/client=<loadBalancerName> |
MTU Discovery | ICMP | 3,4 | .spec.loadBalancerSourceRanges (defaults to 0.0.0.0/0 ) |
kubernetes.io/rule/nlb/mtu=<loadBalancerName> |
Be aware that if .spec.loadBalancerSourceRanges
is not set, Kubernetes will
allow traffic from 0.0.0.0/0
to the Node Security Group(s). If nodes have
public IP addresses, be aware that non-NLB traffic can also reach all instances
in those modified security groups.
In order to limit which client IP’s can access the Network Load Balancer,
specify loadBalancerSourceRanges
.
spec:
loadBalancerSourceRanges:
- "143.231.0.0/16"
Note: NLB only works with certain instance classes, see the AWS documentation for supported instance types.
If there are external IPs that route to one or more cluster nodes, Kubernetes services can be exposed on those
externalIPs
. Traffic that ingresses into the cluster with the external IP (as destination IP), on the service port,
will be routed to one of the service endpoints. externalIPs
are not managed by Kubernetes and are the responsibility
of the cluster administrator.
In the ServiceSpec
, externalIPs
can be specified along with any of the ServiceTypes
.
In the example below, “my-service
” can be accessed by clients on “80.11.12.10:80
”” (externalIP:port
)
kind: Service
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: my-service
spec:
selector:
app: MyApp
ports:
- name: http
protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 9376
externalIPs:
- 80.11.12.10
Using the userspace proxy for VIPs will work at small to medium scale, but will not scale to very large clusters with thousands of Services. See the original design proposal for portals for more details.
Using the userspace proxy obscures the source-IP of a packet accessing a Service
.
This makes some kinds of firewalling impossible. The iptables proxier does not
obscure in-cluster source IPs, but it does still impact clients coming through
a load-balancer or node-port.
The Type
field is designed as nested functionality - each level adds to the
previous. This is not strictly required on all cloud providers (e.g. Google Compute Engine does
not need to allocate a NodePort
to make LoadBalancer
work, but AWS does)
but the current API requires it.
In the future we envision that the proxy policy can become more nuanced than
simple round robin balancing, for example master-elected or sharded. We also
envision that some Services
will have “real” load balancers, in which case the
VIP will simply transport the packets there.
We intend to improve our support for L7 (HTTP) Services
.
We intend to have more flexible ingress modes for Services
which encompass
the current ClusterIP
, NodePort
, and LoadBalancer
modes and more.
The previous information should be sufficient for many people who just want to
use Services
. However, there is a lot going on behind the scenes that may be
worth understanding.
One of the primary philosophies of Kubernetes is that users should not be exposed to situations that could cause their actions to fail through no fault of their own. In this situation, we are looking at network ports - users should not have to choose a port number if that choice might collide with another user. That is an isolation failure.
In order to allow users to choose a port number for their Services
, we must
ensure that no two Services
can collide. We do that by allocating each
Service
its own IP address.
To ensure each service receives a unique IP, an internal allocator atomically updates a global allocation map in etcd prior to creating each service. The map object must exist in the registry for services to get IPs, otherwise creations will fail with a message indicating an IP could not be allocated. A background controller is responsible for creating that map (to migrate from older versions of Kubernetes that used in memory locking) as well as checking for invalid assignments due to administrator intervention and cleaning up any IPs that were allocated but which no service currently uses.
Unlike Pod
IP addresses, which actually route to a fixed destination,
Service
IPs are not actually answered by a single host. Instead, we use
iptables
(packet processing logic in Linux) to define virtual IP addresses
which are transparently redirected as needed. When clients connect to the
VIP, their traffic is automatically transported to an appropriate endpoint.
The environment variables and DNS for Services
are actually populated in
terms of the Service
’s VIP and port.
We support three proxy modes - userspace, iptables and ipvs which operate slightly differently.
As an example, consider the image processing application described above.
When the backend Service
is created, the Kubernetes master assigns a virtual
IP address, for example 10.0.0.1. Assuming the Service
port is 1234, the
Service
is observed by all of the kube-proxy
instances in the cluster.
When a proxy sees a new Service
, it opens a new random port, establishes an
iptables redirect from the VIP to this new port, and starts accepting
connections on it.
When a client connects to the VIP the iptables rule kicks in, and redirects
the packets to the Service proxy
’s own port. The Service proxy
chooses a
backend, and starts proxying traffic from the client to the backend.
This means that Service
owners can choose any port they want without risk of
collision. Clients can simply connect to an IP and port, without being aware
of which Pods
they are actually accessing.
Again, consider the image processing application described above.
When the backend Service
is created, the Kubernetes master assigns a virtual
IP address, for example 10.0.0.1. Assuming the Service
port is 1234, the
Service
is observed by all of the kube-proxy
instances in the cluster.
When a proxy sees a new Service
, it installs a series of iptables rules which
redirect from the VIP to per-Service
rules. The per-Service
rules link to
per-Endpoint
rules which redirect (Destination NAT) to the backends.
When a client connects to the VIP the iptables rule kicks in. A backend is chosen (either based on session affinity or randomly) and packets are redirected to the backend. Unlike the userspace proxy, packets are never copied to userspace, the kube-proxy does not have to be running for the VIP to work, and the client IP is not altered.
This same basic flow executes when traffic comes in through a node-port or through a load-balancer, though in those cases the client IP does get altered.
Iptables operations slow down dramatically in large scale cluster e.g 10,000 Services. IPVS is designed for load balancing and based on in-kernel hash tables. So we can achieve performance consistency in large number of services from IPVS-based kube-proxy. Meanwhile, IPVS-based kube-proxy has more sophisticated load balancing algorithms (least conns, locality, weighted, persistence).
Service is a top-level resource in the Kubernetes REST API. More details about the API object can be found at: Service API object.